Poor handle
would be the primary reason. On that
January 12 card, which comprised only of eight races, the total handle was
$362,955; apparently not enough to cover the operating expenses for the
night. Now granted, eight races anywhere
is not going to cut it, but the few races probably had more to do with the
start of the new meet than anything else.
But my guess is they took a real beating on that Thursday night that Cal
Expo was not ready to try that one again.
Now in
fairness, the Cal Expo race meet is being operated by the fairgrounds
themselves, who traditionally has rented out the racetrack to a different
operator and they found themselves being an operator by default when Sacramento
Harness went bankrupt. However, if you
are a state agency, your goal is not to lose money; especially in a state like
California where money no longer grows on trees and they have severe financial
problems. However, there is a contract
which realistically if can’t be honored should be renegotiated.
But you have
to wonder if there is a problem with their scheduling. Everyone appears to be getting raced but you
have to wonder if fifteen race cards on the weekends work. Let’s face it, how many races can you wager
on from one track? By the end of
Hambletonian Day, the Meadowlands longest day, you are wiped out from all the
action and they are mostly stakes races.
How do people handle a fifteen race card of primarily $2,500
claimers? I suspect they don’t; not well
anyway. It has to be tough on horsemen
as well as customers.
My question
is are they starting too early? Last
Friday, the first race went off around 6:30 and on Saturday, around
6:00pm. My guess is they are starting
soon after the completion of the thoroughbreds in the afternoon while people
are still in the satellite wagering facilities which take wagers on California
races so not to lose them from wagering on their races. In addition, while Cal Expo is allowed only
to simulcast eight harness races a day, Los Alamitos is allowed to simulcast
harness racing, including Cal Expo (no one said this was fair), so I imagine
they are trying to get those gamblers as
well. However, the problem may be by
starting at 9:30 and 9:00pm on the East Coast, they are missing the East Coast
gamblers who are still wagering on their own tracks.
Looking at
February 4’s card, the first six races have small pools, but starting from race
seven the pools are much better, until the last few races. Now, on this particular day, race seven
started at 8:28pm (which is 11:28 on the East Coast and 10:28 in Illinois)
which is when the signals from the East coast and Mid-west start dropping
off. Now, what if Cal Expo started
racing at 8:00pm instead and cut the end races off and moved them to Thursdays,
also with an 8:00pm post time? You will
still have a couple of small pool races, but if you cut the twenty-four minutes
between races to fifteen minutes between races on an average, you could still
be done in about three hours, and get more business from the East Coast and
Midwest; perhaps making more money each night as Cal Expo would hopefully
maximize the benefits of their signal.
Ten races a
day makes sense. If you try to race more
than thirty races a week, you will end up with roughly six horses per race
which is a recipe for disaster. If they
can keep their fields to at least eight horses per race, then exotic wagering
makes sense.
Isn’t it
worth trying one week to see if it works?
If that doesn’t work, maybe Cal Expo needs to consider moving their
Thursday evening cards back to Sunday nights when Los Alamitos is racing. With fewer East coast and Midwest tracks
racing on Sundays, you could start the racing program earlier as there is less
competition.
Something
has to give. The discord between Cal
Expo and the horsemen can’t help in finding a new operator, but to just toss the
third day of racing, which is specified in the contract, without trying something,
is plain wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment