Regarding why so few horses qualify at Yonkers even though they want to race there and why they are qualifying at the Meadowlands. No one wants to go over the half mile oval if they don’t have to.
Besides, who wants to deal with the traffic to get to Yonkers if they don’t
have to? My question is, what happened to the rule if you qualify at the
Meadowlands, you need to make your first start there?
Why drivers don't question driving in front of near-empty grandstands. They are too busy counting
their money to care.
Regarding why can't all tracks agree '0' minutes to post time is post time and coordinate times accordingly. You mean you
want tracks to coordinate and stick to their guns about post time being post
time? Then again, if we can’t agree to this, why should we expect to work
together on other issues?
The secret handle and attendance figures. Handle is meaningless. As for attendance, how depressed do you
want people to get? But why we are at it, we hear about syndicates
getting deals to wager directly into track pools. How much money are they
wagering and what do they pay into the purse account?
Why
don’t programs list disclaimers for often irrelevant elimination races and
preps? Or don’t we care that good money is often burned on starters
seeking to just qualify for the Final? The practical thing would be
to have races for top money earners and a decent purse for a consolation for
the next group of horses, but that would be a change from the way we do it so
bettors beware.
Why are feature races at the end of the card when many people have cleared out? In fairness, this is what the runners do and it works for them. If
this was our only problem.
Shouldn't our optimum races be carded when the most people are at the track? Well, if we raced at post time, this problem could be solved without
trying.
Would
it be so hard to synchronize post times so that races, especially feature
races, don’t overlap each other? It would
seem that if we were ever to have a harness racing channel that would be
mandatory. Yes, it would be mandatory with a harness racing channel. BTW,
wasn’t that supposed to happen? What happened to that idea?
Why
are so many races carded for “winners over $10,000 lifetime” or perhaps
“winners over $25,000 lifetime” when theoretically almost every horse on the
grounds would fit that condition. Because racing secretaries don’t have
enough horses to write classes, (heaven forbid they go with classified racing
again)
Just
how does an extended pari-mutuel race differ from a non-extended one assuming
there is such a thing? This is primarily an Ohio issue. When you win a race at Upper Sandusky, Ohio in a pari-mutuel
race, do you really want to consider this the same as winning a race at Scioto Downs?
How
come at one track the preferred class is a step-up from the open class while at
another track the reverse may be true. I suspect this is more the case of a
racing secretary admitting what kind of racing stock he/she has to work with.
Have
you ever heard anyone who just lost money betting on a horse race state, “That
was fun, maybe I could lose more money next race?” Only when not
sober.
Are
thoroughbred trainers permitted to own pieces of horses in barns other than
their own? I dare say not.
No comments:
Post a Comment