tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4684463172854959042.post3043283780508924073..comments2024-02-27T17:43:37.207-05:00Comments on View From the Racetrack Grandstand: Beat the Favorites?That Blog Guyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15487597769210721585noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4684463172854959042.post-5227409860550544792012-07-07T22:02:57.474-04:002012-07-07T22:02:57.474-04:00What other rationale could there be to have cancel...What other rationale could there be to have cancelled the Exacta? I don't see how it could have been a minus pool either, but apparently the track must have had some fear.<br /><br />As it turns out, don't you wish there was exacta wagering offered? Bridge jumpers must be very relieved as well as they would have been jumping form the rough top.That Blog Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15487597769210721585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4684463172854959042.post-10342140207042964322012-07-07T16:11:22.744-04:002012-07-07T16:11:22.744-04:00I disagree with you and question why exacta wageri...I disagree with you and question why exacta wagering was cancelled in the Yonkers Trot. Surely it cannot be a fear of a minus pool; if this were so, then barring wagering on the race favorite to win would be the logical move. It is almost impossible to create a minus pool in an exotic wager, and it surely would not happen here. In watching races for 45 years at tracks big and small, I can never remember seeing exacta wagering cancelled. What would be the rationale for cancelling it here?JLBnoreply@blogger.com